Price of Diamonds


Alter text size to suit

Price of Diamonds
Price of Diamonds Home
Link to Our Site
Diamond Forum

Diamond Basic Information
Diamond Facts
Diamond Dealers
DeBeers Diamonds
Diamond Formation
The 4 C's of Diamonds
Buy Diamonds
Diamond Clarity
Diamond Color
Diamond Cut
Diamond Weight

Appraising Diamonds
Diamond Appraisal
Diamond Appraisers
Laboratory List
Appraisal abbreviations

Additional Information
ATGA Codes
How to Buy Loose Diamonds
Diamond Selling
Diamond Weight
Weight Categories
Diamonds in Canada
Diamonds - How to Clean
Da Vinci Diamond Cut
Diamond Fakes
Diamond Archives
How to Sell Your Diamond
Famous Diamonds
Diamond Formation
Diamond Properties
Diamond Cutting
Diamond Substitutes

Google
 
Web
priceofdiamonds.org

Diamond Glossary
Who Are We
Diamond Feedback
Diamond Links
Terms
Site Map

Blog Directory - Add Link

Blog Directory & Search engine

De Beers Antitrust Class Action

Have you bought anyone a Diamond in the past 14 years? If the answer is yes you might have some hard cash coming your way.

The worlds largest diamond producers, South Africa’s De Beers group, will pay $300 million to settle a price fixing lawsuit. This means you may receive a cash refund..

So who is eligible? Well virtually anyone who bought a diamond or a diamond ring or even some diamond jewelry.

Who’s eligible? Anyone who bought an individual diamond, a diamond ring, or diamond jewelry valued at more than $95 between 1994 and 2006. How much you get back depends on how many people apply. In addition you must have your original receipt to qualify.

This as per co-counsel, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, serving as plaintiffs’ class counsel in a suit by diamond consumers against South African company De Beers, the world’s largest diamond supplier.

Here are the hot details.

Allegations Plaintiffs alleged that De Beers, a privately held group of foreign-based companies, had monopolized the international diamond business through its control of mines and a web of agreements with diamond suppliers in other countries. De Beers denied the allegation and maintained that it is not subject to the jurisdiction of United States courts. Captioned Sullivan et al. v. DB Investments, Inc. et al., the federal court class action names DB Investments, Inc., De Beers S.A., De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd., De Beers A.G., Diamond Trading Company, CSO Valuations A.G., Central Selling Organization, and De Beers Centenary A.G. as defendants.

Settlement Given Preliminary Approval

On November 29, 2005, U.S. District Judge Stanley R. Chesler gave preliminary approval to a settlement of the class action. Under the terms of the agreement, De Beers will pay $250 million to U.S. jewelry makers, retailers, and consumers who purchased diamonds beginning in 1994. Equally significant, De Beers agreed to an injunction requiring it to abide by the United States federal and state antitrust laws, and to submit to the jurisdiction of United States courts for enforcement of the injunction. Following preliminary approval of the settlement, Judge Chesler appointed a special master to consider the allocation and distribution of the settlement money among jewelry makers, retailers, and consumers.

Claims May Now Be Submitted Under The Settlement

Consumers who purchased diamonds between January 1, 1994 through March 31, 2006 may be eligible for a payment under a proposed settlement in a class action lawsuit against the De Beers group of companies. The settlement provides over $130 million to the consumer class and prevents De Beers from continuing its illegal business practices. Claim forms must be submitted by May 19, 2008. To learn more about the settlement and to file a claim on-line, visit www.diamondsclassaction.com.

To Top of Price of Diamonds


Copyright © 2006, 2007,2008 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Technical Author Services Pty Ltd. A private limited company incorporated in Victoria, Australia. ABN. 126 773 126.
While the information presented is from sources we believe to be reliable, we do not guarantee the accuracyor validity of any information presented by
Technical Author Services Pty Ltd or the views expressed by users.